Original Research

Perceptions of Emergency Medical Care students on high-fidelity manikins versus standardised patients: Insights from a pilot mixed-methods study

Karien Henrico, Getrude M. Motadi
Health SA Gesondheid | Vol 31 | a3306 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v31i0.3306 | © 2026 Karien Henrico, Getrude M. Motadi | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 03 October 2025 | Published: 30 May 2026

About the author(s)

Karien Henrico, Department of Emergency Medical Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Getrude M. Motadi, Department of Emergency Medical Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based education is central to Emergency Medical Care (EMC) training, particularly in preparing students for high-pressure, pre-hospital environments. High-fidelity manikins (HFMs) and standardised patients (SPs) are widely used simulation modalities; however, comparative evidence from low- to middle-income countries remains limited. Understanding student satisfaction with these modalities is important for ensuring educational quality and making informed resource allocation.
Aim: This study explored EMC students’ satisfaction with HFMs and SPs to inform pedagogical and resource-related decisions.
Setting: The study was conducted in a university-based simulation laboratory at a South African higher education institution.
Methods: A pilot mixed-methods design was employed. Fifteen first-year EMC students completed the same clinical simulation scenario using both a SP and a HFM. Satisfaction was measured using a revised Satisfaction Scale for High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation and two open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, and qualitative responses were analysed thematically.
Results: High levels of satisfaction were reported for both simulation modalities. Standardised patients received higher satisfaction scores for realism, theory-practice integration and self-confidence, while HFMs were rated more favourably for practising technical skills and learning from mistakes. Qualitative findings indicated that SPs enhanced realism and engagement but were associated with increased stress.
Conclusion: Despite the small cohort, clear preferences and educational implications emerged. The findings support the use of blended simulation approaches and highlight the need for further, larger-scale research.
Contribution: This study provides preliminary evidence to inform simulation-based curriculum design and resource allocation in EMC education within resource-constrained contexts.


Keywords

student satisfaction; standardised patient; high-fidelity manikin; simulation-based education; South Africa

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 4: Quality education

Metrics

Total abstract views: 307
Total article views: 158


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.