Original Research

Midwives’ cardiotocograph interpretation and documentation knowledge in a selected Gauteng hospital

Sifiso Dlamini, Kagiso P. Tukisi, Roinah Ngunyulu
Health SA Gesondheid | Vol 31 | a3260 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v31i0.3260 | © 2026 Sifiso Dlamini, Kagiso P. Tukisi, Roinah Ngunyulu | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 01 September 2025 | Published: 21 January 2026

About the author(s)

Sifiso Dlamini, Department of Advanced Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Venda, Thohoyandou, South Africa; and Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Kagiso P. Tukisi, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Roinah Ngunyulu, Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Cardiotocography (CTG) is a globally used intrapartum monitoring tool to assess the foetal heart rate and the related responses to the physiology of the uterine action. The intrapartum foetal monitoring is the primary responsibility of the midwives caring for the woman in labour. Midwives’ knowledge and understanding of CTG traces and interpretation ensure timely responses to pathological findings, thus ensuring positive foetal and neonatal outcomes.
Aim: The study aimed to assess the midwives’ knowledge of cardiotocograph interpretation and documentation in a selected hospital in Gauteng.
Setting: The data were collected in a selected secondary hospital, a referral hospital for the midwife-led obstetric units and district hospitals in the Gauteng province.
Methods: The study employed a quantitative retrospective research design, utilising a checklist to analyse patients’ past medical records – this retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate midwives’ knowledge in interpreting CTG.
Results: A review of 336 CTG case records analysed five criteria: baseline heart rate, variability, decelerations, accelerations, and overall trace assessment. Significant discrepancies in record-keeping were found between midwives and researchers. Researchers maintained complete records and interpretations for all criteria, whereas midwives exhibited considerable gaps, ranging from 31% to 100% across the CTG criteria.
Conclusion: Analysis indicates a substantial gap in CTG documentation by midwives compared to researchers.
Contribution: Midwives exhibiting significant data omissions that may affect intrapartum care quality and clinical decisions.


Keywords

cardiotocograph; interpretation; knowledge; documentation; midwives; Gauteng

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 3: Good health and well-being

Metrics

Total abstract views: 1453
Total article views: 583


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.