Original Research

Water, sanitation and hygiene in rural Greater Letaba Municipality, South Africa

Mapula L. Molewa, Tobias G. Barnard, Nisha Naicker
Health SA Gesondheid | Vol 30 | a2940 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2940 | © 2025 Mapula L. Molewa, Tobias G. Barnard, Nisha Naicker | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 07 December 2024 | Published: 22 October 2025

About the author(s)

Mapula L. Molewa, Water and Health Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Tobias G. Barnard, Water and Health Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Nisha Naicker, Department of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute for Occupational Health, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa

Abstract

Background: Limited access to improved water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) facilities disproportionately affects low- and middle-income nations, impacting human well-being, health, education and income.
Aim: This study aimed to assess access to water, improved sanitation and hygiene practices as well as to describe the occurrence of diarrhoeal illnesses in the Greater Letaba Municipality (GLM) in Limpopo, South Africa.
Setting: The study was conducted in the villages of Ward 2 of the Bolobedu region under GLM.
Methods: A cross-sectional study sampled 120 households through a multistage probability sampling design. Data on WASH access and diarrhoeal episodes were collected through a pre-tested structured interview questionnaire and analysed with STATA 18.0.
Results: Although all households had toilets, primarily pit latrines (92%), access to improved water sources was limited, with 62% depending on communal taps. Seventy-four per cent of households had access to handwashing facilities with soap and water. Eighty-one households (68%) reported that family members consistently washed their hands with soap and water after using the toilet. Most households (67%) experienced occasional diarrhoea over the past year. Diarrhoea prevalence was significantly correlated (p ≤ 0.001) with water storage practices, availability of handwashing facilities and the frequency of post-toilet handwashing.
Conclusion: Despite universal toilet access, WASH infrastructure remained inadequate.
Contribution: The study highlights the association between precarious water storage, handwashing practices and diarrhoeal illness, emphasising the importance of promoting hygiene alongside infrastructure development in rural areas.


Keywords

sanitation; water; hygiene; waste management; diarrhoea; rural areas

Sustainable Development Goal

Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation

Metrics

Total abstract views: 246
Total article views: 235


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.