Original Research
Community perceived barriers to uptake of health services among men at Sedibeng district in South Africa
Submitted: 01 November 2023 | Published: 22 May 2024
About the author(s)
Ndumiso Tshuma, The Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South AfricaDaniel N. Elakpa, Center for Health Policy, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
Clinton Moyo, The Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa
Tshepo M. Ndhlovu, The Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa
Mathildah M. Mokgatle, Department of Public Health, School of Healthcare Sciences, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
Sangiwe Moyo, The Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa; and, The Final Mile, Johannesburg, South Africa
Sehlule Moyo, The Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa; and, Department of Environmental Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Martha Chadyiwa, Department of Environmental Health, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
Mandeep K. Kochar, Bombay Teachers’ Training College, HSNC University, Colaba, Mumbai, India
Mokgadi Malahlela, The Best Health Solutions, Johannesburg, South Africa
Takalani G. Tshitangano, Department of Public Health, University of Venda, Limpopo, South Africa
David D. Mphuthi, Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa
Abstract
Background: This qualitative study aimed to investigate the barriers that hinder men’s utilisation of healthcare services in the Sedibeng district of South Africa.
Methods: The study was conducted using flyers with questions posted on the Best Health Solutions’ Facebook page for two weeks. A convenience sampling method was used and a total of 104 comments were collected from 64 respondents. The authors analysed the participants’ self-reported data thematically on demographics, geographic area, and reasons for men not using healthcare services.
Results: The findings revealed that sociocultural norms played a significant role in men’s reluctance to seek medical help, as it was perceived as a sign of weakness. The scarcity of male healthcare professionals hinders open discussions. Stigma and discrimination were identified as substantial barriers. Convenience, trust, and confidentiality concerns, along with the influence of intimate partners, also influence men’s decision-making.
Conclusion: This study highlights the complex interplay between various barriers that impact men’s utilisation of healthcare services in the district. By addressing these factors, healthcare providers and policymakers can enhance healthcare access and promote better health outcomes for men in Sedibeng district.
Contribution: The manuscript’s primary contribution lies in uncovering multifaceted barriers to men’s healthcare utilisation in Sedibeng district. It explores socio-cultural norms, healthcare worker demographics, stigma, discrimination, convenience factors, trust, confidentiality concerns, and the influence of intimate partners on men’s healthcare choices. These insights illuminate the complex factors affecting men’s healthcare access, providing valuable knowledge for healthcare providers and policymakers.
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goal
Metrics
Total abstract views: 1981Total article views: 1516