Original Research

Evidence-based recommendations to facilitate professional collaboration between allopathic and traditional health practitioners

Rachel M. (Dalena) van Rooyen, Blanche Pretorius, Nomazwi M. Tembani, Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi
Health SA Gesondheid | Vol 22 | a1016 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v22i0.1016 | © 2017 Rachel M. (Dalena) van Rooyen, Blanche Pretorius, Nomazwi M. Tembani, Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi | This work is licensed under CC Attribution 4.0
Submitted: 10 October 2017 | Published: 10 October 2017

About the author(s)

Rachel M. (Dalena) van Rooyen, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa
Blanche Pretorius, Research Capacity Development, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa
Nomazwi M. Tembani, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa
Wilma ten Ham-Baloyi, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF (266KB)

Share this article

Bookmark and Share

Abstract

Background: Globally, and in South Africa, there is an increased demand for consulting both traditional and allopathic health practitioners. As both health practitioners are working within the same communities, their respective practices could complement or undermine the health of consumers using both health services. Professional collaboration between traditional and allopathic health practitioners is therefore desirable and requires collaboration between the systems, which is currently legislated by the Traditional Health Practitioners Act 22 of 2007. However, in the Eastern Cape, no evidence-based recommendations were found that facilitated the collaborative relationship between the two health practitioner groups.

Purpose of the research: To develop evidence-based recommendations aimed at facilitating professional collaboration between allopathic and traditional health practitioners for the benefit of patients.

Methodology: Descriptive evidence-based recommendations to enhance professional collaboration between both groups of health practitioners were developed based on focus group interviews with allopathic practitioners (n = 10) and individual interviews with traditional health practitioners (n = 18) (traditional health practitioners (n = 14) and traditional healers who are also allopathic health practitioners (n = 4)) practising in the Amathole District in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Dickoff et al.'s (1968) Survey List wasused as a conceptual framework.

Results: Collaboration was hampered by allopathic practitioners demonstrating negative attitudes by not referring patients to traditional practitioners based on lack of knowledge and mutual understanding of each other's practices. Suggestions for collaboration made by both groups resulted in the development of two distinct sets of evidence-based recommendations.The first set of recommendations aims to enhance professional collaboration between both groups of health practitioners. This is done through facilitating mutual understanding based on respect and acceptance between the different practitioners. The second set of recommendations aims to enhance professional collaboration through facilitating open communication between different practitioners.

Conclusion: These evidence-based recommendations can be used to facilitate professional collaboration between allopathic and traditional health practitioners resulting in mutual understanding and open communication, enhancing team work in a multi-professional environment, and ultimately leading to improved patient care.


Keywords

Allopathic health practitioners; Traditional health practitioners; Collaboration; Evidence-based recommendations; South Africa

Metrics

Total abstract views: 258
Total article views: 147


Crossref Citations

No related citations found.